[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alternatives DB corruption



On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> > Hum, that should not happen. You should always be able to
> > update-alternatives to fix stuff.
> 
> Not when you manage to get into circular dependencies.

You will have to be more specific because this doesn't mean anything to
me.

> > You won't have to do this in the future, update-alternatives no longer
> > allows installation of broken alternatives and fixes stuff itself for most
> > cases.
> 
> When did that change get rolled out?

With squeeze (dpkg >= 1.15).

> Manually fixing up dpkg  status & info files becomes an ingrained habit
> over the years. The Debian & Ubuntu bleeding egde will cut you every now
> and then with problems that force manual intervention.

While this can be true for {post,pre}{inst,rm}, it's completely
wrong for most others status files (except maybe the statoverride one when
user/groups disappear).

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)


Reply to: