Previously Paul Seelig wrote: > ... that's *really* bad. So what's the point putting it into it's own > package? So you can remove it at woody+2. We have to start the process sometime. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |