[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal



On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:14:52PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> They mention, "We likely have to complete Modern C porting first to remove
> any instances of -Wimplicit-function-declaration otherwise the redirects in
> glibc for e.g. time->time64 won't actually work." That links to:
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/874js2iqlg.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/

> Has that issue been considered here? (I can't speak intelligently on it at
> this time. I just want to make sure it's on your radar.)

Thanks, I was unaware of this.  Sounds like feature=+time64 should also emit
-Wno-implicit-function-declaration; cc:ing the bug on dpkg regarding
implementation of that interface.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: