Accepted ia32-libs 1.4 (source ia64)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:37:55 +0200
Source: ia32-libs
Binary: lib32gcc1 ia32-libs ia32-libs-dev
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>
Description:
ia32-libs - ia32 shared libraries for use on amd64 and ia64 systems
ia32-libs-dev - ia32 development libraries and headers for use on ia32/ia64 syste
lib32gcc1 - GCC support library (ia32)
Closes: 305122 306512 307521
Changes:
ia32-libs (1.4) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Correctly adjust the GROUP commands in linker scripts this time.
Thanks to Goswin von Brederlow for the patch. This also means we
don't mangle random libraries either. Closes: #305122, #306512.
* Ship /usr/lib32 as a symlink to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. This makes
gcc -m32 happy again on amd64. Closes: #307521
* We're not doing anything clever with ia32-libs-dev.{preinst,postrm},
so don't pretend to either.
Files:
b5fcc9f7e96650bb583038d127bd3f34 562 libs optional ia32-libs_1.4.dsc
05ce31dc50be48e1139162e53400ea24 214730700 libs optional ia32-libs_1.4.tar.gz
539278161a0adcf48aba3693c63d77a2 9292476 libs optional ia32-libs_1.4_ia64.deb
84dbf9f4f56ad37d05ddad490fc3700f 2141572 libdevel optional ia32-libs-dev_1.4_ia64.deb
fed92851e7f23c5588be95c4124bc5bb 78856 libs optional lib32gcc1_3.4.3-12+ia32.libs.1.4_ia64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCeh27QSseMYF6mWoRAqIIAJ9v/JUS3Od3TufF5nP1hDqqtakB4QCg11vD
VxHBQlnKfWppKwK8UMkaz0o=
=80uz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
ia32-libs-dev_1.4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs-dev_1.4_ia64.deb
ia32-libs_1.4.dsc
to pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_1.4.dsc
ia32-libs_1.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_1.4.tar.gz
ia32-libs_1.4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_1.4_ia64.deb
lib32gcc1_3.4.3-12+ia32.libs.1.4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/i/ia32-libs/lib32gcc1_3.4.3-12+ia32.libs.1.4_ia64.deb
Reply to: