Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

[Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> writes:

    >> I suspect the reason you want to make this MBF is that you
    >> believe it
    Luca> will somehow make the transition easier if there are fewer
    Luca> files in /bin or /usr/bin.

    Luca> IE, you immediately escalated it with aggressiveness followed
    Luca> by baseless accusations verging on the conspiratorial.

I regret that my second statement came across as an accusation and
certainly that you heard it as a conspiracy.
I'd like to be heard differently.
My understanding at the time (which you have since corrected) is that
you were making the proposal because you believed it would make a
transition to canonical paths easier.
In my mind that would be a good reason for advocating for such a
transition.
That is the spirit in which I made the assumption about your reasoning.
Again, I regret that you heard  things in a different tone.

I read your original message as a valuable contribution that in my
analysis I  thought was a bad idea because of the dpkg disappearing file
bug.

--Sam