Re: quality of the cd images we are offering
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:28:59PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > pule:/cdrom# find . -name Packages -exec grep '^Package: ' {} \;|wc -l
> > > 984
> >
> > Make that grep '^Filename: ' | cut -d ' ' -f 2- | sort > packdebs
> >
> > > pule:/cdrom# find . -type f -name '*.deb'|wc -l
> > > 990
> >
> > and find... | sort > realdebs
> >
> > then check the diff. That might give a clue about the cause of non-inclusion.
> > Note that dpkg-scanpackages will not include two .debs with the same package
> > name, this might be the case here.
> >
>
> lucretia:/tmp$ ls /cdrom/upgrade/*deb
> /cdrom/upgrade/apt_0.3.10slink11.deb /cdrom/upgrade/dpkg_1.4.0.34.deb
> lucretia:/tmp$
Indeed, these should not be listed in the Packages file. But since there is no
{woody,sid}/main/upgrade*/ yet, that's not (yet!!) a problem.
> I suppose there may be more debs hidden in some random location on the cd's.
I don't know how exactly the Packages file is generated for woody/sid now, but
it seems wisest to only look for .deb files in the dists/ and pool/
directories.
Regards,
Anne Bezemer
Reply to: