Re: installation-guide_20220129_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Holger Wansing, le dim. 30 janv. 2022 13:42:10 +0100, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote (Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:23:25 +0100):
> > In general 3.69 -> 3.68+deb11u1 update looks wrong, it has to be
> > increasing :)
Mmm, sorry, even if that's what caught my eye, this isn't an absolute
rule.
> Hmm, increasing is of course right.
> However, I guessed this goes per distribution, so:
> current version in stable is 3.68, that's why I chose 3.68deb11u1.
> Looking at the version history in stable, that would be indeed an increase.
> ?
Yes, and that's usually what happens: we upload to stable some patched
versions of what is already in stable.
> So, if I understand that correctly:
> - I do an upload to unstable now, which is then 3.69
Yes.
> - Then I can upload to stable, which then gets 3.69deb11u1
> Would that be correct?
It would have to be less that 3.69 actually, so that on upgrading to
bookworm the package gets "upgraded" to 3.69.
I guess best would be 3.69~deb11u1, to say that it's essentially 3.69,
but before 3.69 from bookworm.
Samuel
Reply to: