Re: inkscape not installable from jessie-backports (depends libgsl10ldbl)
Le 04/04/2017 à 11:21, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> Le 03/04/2017 à 16:41, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
>>>> That way we should enable installing latest inkscape from backport in
>>>> addition to other scientific software. What do you think about this?
>>>
>>> That it wouldn't be a good idea.
>
> ACK.
>
>>> Whilst it would solve Afif's problem, gsl might be used by also other
>>> packages in the archive and also installed in the users' system, and by
>>> doing so you might cause installability problems in other packages.
>>>
>>> I instead recommend tweaking gsl backport to remove the conflict against
>>> the old library.
>>>
>>
>> I looked at the code. The cblas part seems to not have changed between
>> the two versions, so it looks like it would work to simply not ship
>> libgslcblas in libgsl2, and let libgsl2 depend on lbgsl0ldbl.
>
> Any volunteer to implement this? I admit I feel responsible for the
> mess and would surely try to solve it. However, I have the impression
> that I'm not the most competent person for the job. While it seems like
> simply adding something like
>
> find debian -name "libgslcblas*" -delete
Its simpler than that: remove libgslcblas0 from libgsl2.install as well
as the corresponding line in libgsl2.shlibs.
>
> inside debian/rules plus
>
> Depends: lbgsl0ldbl
And remove the conflict and replace bits.
I'm currently trying to build it, but for some reason I've had trouble
with sbuild since I upgraded to stretch.
Regards, Thibaut.
> in debian/control would do the trick I would prefer if somebody who is
> more involved in these issues would take an additional look.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
Reply to: