[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Owncloud - user_ldap fails while upgrading to 7.0.1



Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 22:26:03 schrieb Paul Muster:
> On 26.08.2014 21:40, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 21:18:30 schrieb Paul Muster:
> >> after upgrading Owncloud from 6.0.3+dfsg-2~bpo70+1 to
> >> 7.0.1+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 and pressing "Start update" I get this error:
> >> 
> >> An exception occurred while executing 'ALTER TABLE
> >> `oc_oc_ldap_user_mapping_765af71f2a59b` DROP PRIMARY KEY':
> >> SQLSTATE[42000]: Syntax error or access violation: 1091 Can't DROP
> >> 'PRIMARY'; check that column/key exists
> >> 
> >> What happened? How to fix it?
> >> 
> >> Which information can I deliver to enable you analyzing this?
> >> 
> >> Is this a Backports-specific problem or should it better be discussed on
> >> a) the Debian bug tracking system or b) the normal owncloud-user
> >> mailinglist?
> > 
> > I think this problem has been discussed before. Please check this list.
> 
> Do you think about the thread with the subject
> "Re: Bug#757549: owncloud: DB-Errors on Migration 6.0.3 to 7.0.0"
> ? In this thread there was _just an error message but no malfunction_.
> In my case the upgrade _stopped_ after the above shown message.

I am not sure… I think…

> After thinking about the problem I now could finish upgrade by
> 
> mv /usr/share/owncloud/apps/user_ldap /usr/share/owncloud/apps/user_ldap#
> 
> 
> Now - not surprisingly - authentication for users does not work any
> more. When I rename the directory back to "user_ldap" again, every click
> in the web interface leads to "Failed to upgrade "user_ldap".".

I read about this being an upstream issue with the ldap app and that there was 
a link to a fix, but I don´t remember the exact details as… I don´t use ldap 
auth.

Ciao,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: