Re: New policy for backports.org
Anthony DeRobertis schrieb am Donnerstag, den 23. August 2007:
> On 08/23/2007 09:57 AM, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> >
> >Imho, the policy should also contain information about how to handle
> >oldstable-bpo. IIrc, the following rules have been agreed upon:
> >
> Last stuff I could find in the archive is:
>
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070509.073410.771a332d.en.html
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070509.095642.1db78b28.en.html
> http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20070625.173317.c42a77f1.en.html
>
> So, the current policy seems to be that its frozen and nothing but
> security updates should go in, pending some archive change.
I'm sorry I missed that point, I will enhance the policy about the things
sebastian harl sid. Sarge-bpo is free again, but take sure that the version
in etch-bpo or etch is bigger than in sarge-bpo. For a version in sarge-bpo
that is bigger than in etch that means you have to provide a backport for
etch-bpo too.
Alex
Reply to: