[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: VFAT: Very stupid question



Hi -

Using debian x86_64 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8, I think I see the same problem
that greg reported in
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/10/msg00315.html

It gets stranger, though:
  1. The same memory stick reads and writes fine on my x86 sarge
     laptop.
  2. When I check to see if VFAT works, using the method
     described by Harald Dunkel in that thread, it does work.
  3. fdisk /dev/sdb works fine, I see a 128Meg partition as sdb1
  4. I get one more message out of the failed mount command
     when I run it on the console:
         FAT: invalid media value (0xb9)
  5. After upgrading to 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8, I can no longer access
     the partition table on the memory stick.  /var/log/messages
     cut-and paste appended.
Test conditions:
  Kingston DataTraveler 2.0  Rev: 4.10
  MSI K8T Neo2, MS-6702E
  AMD Athlon64 3500+
This motherboard has four USB controllers, each one shows up as
  VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller

This uses the memory stick with its out-of-the-box partition table.
Don't tell me to put a new partition table on it, that approach would
leave me in the dark when someone gives me their memory stick with
useful files on it.

I haven't recompiled a custom kernel for this box yet, but I will if
someone suggests a useful experiment.

       - Larry

P.S. I really like debian-amd64 on this computer.  For an unstable
distribution, it's really very clean.  This is one of only a handful
of warts.  And the performance is phenomenal!

---start snip from /var/log/messages---
Nov  1 11:44:29 localhost kernel: usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using addre
ss 5
Nov  1 11:44:29 localhost usb.agent[3533]:      ub: already loaded
Nov  1 11:44:29 localhost kernel: uba: device 5 capacity nsec 50 bsize 512
Nov  1 11:44:31 localhost kernel: uba: made changed
Nov  1 11:44:33 localhost kernel: uba: device 5 capacity nsec 50 bsize 512
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: uba: device 5 capacity nsec 50 bsize 512
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel:  /dev/ub/a:end_request: I/O error, dev uba, se
ctor 0
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 2
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 4
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 6
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 6
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 4
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 2
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 0
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel:  unable to read partition table
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel:  /dev/ub/a:end_request: I/O error, dev uba, se
ctor 2
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 4
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 6
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev uba, sector 0
Nov  1 11:44:35 localhost kernel:  unable to read partition table
---end snip from /var/log/messages---



Reply to: