Re: Weird problem with RHEL5 isofs driver when using mkisofs -x --exclude options
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:23:23 +0200, Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de
(Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>Giulio Orsero <giulioo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:37:03 +0200, Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de
>> (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>> [root@localhost d0]# ls -la isotest
>> total 32
>> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 9 09:02 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jul 9 09:02 ..
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 1 2008 dir1
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 1 2008 dir2
>> [root@localhost d0]# ls -f isotest
>> dir2 dir1 .. .
>> [root@localhost d0]#
>
>OK, so the filesystem does not behave as expected on UNIX:
>
>If "." and ".." are delivered at all, they come first.
>
>In any case, the -find variant of the command line I send you should
>work. Did you test it?
Sorry, I hadn't seen it, here's the output:
===========
mkisofs 2.01.01a42 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric
Youngdale (C) 1997-2008 Jörg Schilling
Setting input-charset to 'UTF-8' from locale.
Total translation table size: 0
Total rockridge attributes bytes: 653
Total directory bytes: 4096
Path table size(bytes): 34
Max brk space used 21000
177 extents written (0 MB)
Directory listing of /
23 drwxr-xr-x 4 0 0 2048 Jul 9 2008 [ 23 02] .
23 drwxr-xr-x 4 0 0 2048 Jul 9 2008 [ 23 02] ..
25 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 1 2008 [ 25 02] dir1
24 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 1 2008 [ 24 02] dir2
Directory listing of /dir1/
25 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 1 2008 [ 25 02] .
25 drwxr-xr-x 4 0 0 2048 Jul 9 2008 [ 25 02] ..
Directory listing of /dir2/
24 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 2048 Jan 1 2008 [ 24 02] .
24 drwxr-xr-x 4 0 0 2048 Jul 9 2008 [ 24 02] ..
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2048 Jan 1 2008 dir1 <=== CORRECT
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2048 Jan 1 2008 dir2
=============
Now I'm a bit confused.
The "non working" iso image produced on RHEL5 has correct
permissions/timestamp if I transfer in on a RHEL3 system.
So, is this a RHEL5 general fs issue or a RHEL5 isofs issue?
Why would the method used my mkisofs matter if isoinfo show the same output?
--
giulioo@pobox.com
Reply to: